Interactive Effects of Residue and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Melon
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of residue and tillage on growth and yield of melon. Tillage treatments included conventional tillage (using a moldboard plough and two passes with a disk harrow), minimum tillage (one pass with a disk harrow), and no tillage (NT). Residue treatments included the application of 0%, 30% and 60% residue. Yield and yield components were obtained for all treatments. Tillage significantly affected yield and its components (P ≤ 0.05). The maximum FWPP (2.678 kg), NFPP (6.799), D (18.49 cm), L (45.93 cm), S (12.51%) and RUE (2.470) and yield (16.17 t/ha) were recorded in the conventional tillage treatment. Also, maximum FWPP (2.192 kg), NFPP (5.353), D (16.66 cm), L (39.52 cm) and yield (12.83 t/ha) were observed in the 30% residue treatment. In terms of the interaction effects, maximum FWPP (2.850 kg), NFPP (6.790), D (20.71 cm), L (53.53 cm) and yield (17.09 t/ha) were obtained in the conventional tillage + 30% residue treatment. Therefore, the use of a moldboard plough followed by two passes with a disk harrow, in concert with 30% residue treatment, were maximizing the yield Almost all growth indicators had the optimum values in the conservation tillage treatments.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbari, M. Neamatollahi, E., & Neamatollahi, P. (2019). Evaluation land suitability of spatial planning in arid regions of eastern Iran using fuzzy logic and multi-criteria analysis. Ecological Indicators, 98, 587-598. DOI
Awe, G. O., Reichert, J. M., & Fontanela, E. (2020). Sugarcane production in the subtropics: Seasonal changes in soil properties and crop yield in no-tillage, inverting and minimum tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 196, 104447. DOI
Bauder, J. W., Randall, G. W., & Swann, J. B. (1981). Effect of four continuous tillage systems on mechanical impedance of a clay loam soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45(4), 802–806. DOI
Chaudhry, A. D., Javed, M., Rana, M. A., & Sarwar, A. (1992). Conventional tillage practices under rice-wheat rotation system. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1), 5–8. Retrieved from PDF
Doss, B. D., Turner, C. E., & Evans, J. L. (1980). Irrigation methods and in-row chiseling for tomato production. Journal American Society for Horticultural Science, 105(4), 611–614. Retrieved from website
Hemmat, A., & Taki, O. (2001). Grain yield of irrigated winter wheat as affected by stubble-tillage management and seeding rates in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research, 63(1), 57–64. DOI
Hill, R. L. (1990). Long-term conventional and no-tillage effects on selected soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54(1), 161–166. DOI
Hughes, K. A., Horne, D. J., Ross, C. W., & Julian, J. F. (1992). A 10-year maize/oats rotation under three tillage systems. 2. Plant population, root distribution and forage yields. Soil and Tillage Research, 22(1), 145–157. DOI
Iqbal, M., Anwar-ul-Hassan, Ali, A., & Rizwanullah, M. (2005). Residual effect of tillage and farm manure on some soil physicalproperties and growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 7(1), 54–57. Retrieved from website
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., & Kienzle, J. (2015). Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Report, 8, 1–12. Retrieved from website
Khan, F.-U.-H., Tahir, A. R., & Yule, I. J. (2001). Intrinsic implication of different tillage practices on soil penetration resistance and crop growth. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 3(1), 23–26. Retrieved from PDF
Kraft, N. J. B., Valencia, R., & Ackerly, D. D. (2008). Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science, 322(5901), 580–582. DOI
Kurshid, K., Iqbal, M., Arif, M. S., & Nawaz, A. (2006). Effect of tillage and mulch on soil physical properties and growth of maize. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 8(5), 593–596. Retrieved from PDF
Laborde, J. P., Wortmann, C. S., Blanco-Canqui, H., Baigorria, G. A., & Lindquist, J. L. (2020). Identifying the drivers and predicting the outcome of conservation agriculture globally. Agricultural Systems, 177, 102692. DOI
León Pacheco, R. I., Correa Álvarez, E. M., Romero Ferrer, J. L., Arias Bonilla, H., Gómez-Correa, J. C., Yacomelo Hernández, M. J., & Pérez Artiles, L. (2019). Accumulation of degree days and their effect on the potential yield of 15 eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) accessions in the Colombian Caribbean. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomia Medellin, 72(3), 8917–8926. DOI
Li, Y., Li, Z., Cui, S., Jagadamma, S., & Zhang, Q. (2009). Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: A global meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 194, 104292. DOI
Nabati, J., Nezami, A., Neamatollahi, E., & Akbari, M. (2020). GIS-based agro-ecological zoning for crop suitability using fuzzy inference system in semi-arid regions. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106646. DOI
Nasrian, A., Akbari, M., Faridhosseini, a., & Neamatollahi, E. (2019). Spatio-temporal monitoring of ground water changes on desertification intensity in agricultural areas in Dargaz plain, Khorasan Razavi province. Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal, 7(21), 75-90. DOI
Neamatollahi, E., Bannayan, M., Jahansuz, M. R., Struik, P., & Farid, A. (2012). Agro-ecological zoning for wheat (Triticum aestivum), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and corn (Zea mays) on the Mashhad plain, Khorasan Razavi province. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 15(1), 99–112. DOI
Jain, N., Chauhan, H. S., Singh, P. K., & Shukla, K. N. (2000). Response of tomato under drip irrigation and plastic mulching. In 6th International Micro-irrigation Congress (Micro 2000), Cape Town, South Africa, 22-27 October 2000 (pp. 1–6). Rome, IT: International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage. Retrieved from website
Peixoto, D. S., Silva, B. M., de Oliveira, G. C., Moreira, S. G., da Silva, F., & Curi, N. (2019). A soil compaction diagnosis method for occasional tillage recommendation under continuous no tillage system in Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research, 194, 104307. DOI
Rashidi, M., Keshafarzpour, F., & Gholami, M. (2008). Effect of different tillage methods on yield and yield components of forage corn. American-Eurasian Journal Of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 3(3), 347–351. Retrieved from PDF
Rashidi, M., & Keshavarzpour, F. (2007a). Effect of different tillage methods on grain yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 9(2), 274–277. Retrieved from PDF
Rashidi, M., & Keshavarzpour, F. (2007b). Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris). Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2(6), 1–6. Retrieved from website
Rashidi, M., & Keshavarzpour, F. (2008). Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of melon (Cucumis melo). Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 3(2), 41–46. Retrieved from PDF
Reddy, S. S., Reddy, K. C., & Roberson, T. (2007). Influence of conservation tillage and poultry litter application on carbon dioxide efflux from soil in cotton production systems. In ASA/CSSA/SSSA Annual Meetings, New Orleans, LA., November 4-8, 2007. Retrieved from PDF
Shrivastava, P. K., Parikh, M. M., Sawani, N. G., & Raman, S. (1994). Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on tomato yield. Agricultural Water Management, 25(2), 179–184. DOI
Statistical Center of Iran. (2015). Statistical Year Book, 2015. Retrieved from website
Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Statistical Year Book, 2016. Retrieved from website
Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1984). Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from website
Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2018). Performance of combined offset disc harrow (front active and rear passive set configuration) in soil bin. Journal of Terramechanics, 78, 27–37. DOI
Villordon, A., Clark, C., Ferrin, D., & LaBonte, D. (2009). Using growing degree days, agrometeorological variables, linear regression, and data mining methods to help improve prediction of sweetpotato harvest date in Louisiana. HortTechnology, 19(1), 133–144. DOI
DOI: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v43i3.2968
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.