NONPARAMETRIC STABILITY ANALYSIS OF YIELD FOR NINE CHILI PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.) GENOTYPES IN EIGHT ENVIRONMENTS

Vitria Puspitasari Rahadi, Muhamad Syukur, Sriani Sujiprihati, Rahmi Yunianti

Abstract


 The objectives of this study were to compare nonparametric stability measures, and to identify promising high yield and stability of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes in eight environments. In every environment, a Randomized Complete Block Design was used with three replications. The method of Nassar and Huehn, Kang, Fox, and Thennarasu was used to analyze the stability and high yield. Spearman’s correlation and Principal Component analysis distinguishes the methods based on two different concepts of stability: the static (biological) and dynamic (agronomic) concepts. The top method was found to be the dynamic stability. Meanwhile, the methods of Si1, Si2, Si3, Si6, Npi1, NPi2, NPi3 and NPi4 were found to be the static stability. Based on the ranking frequency stability of the nonparametric method, the genotypes with the highest frequency of static stability ranking were genotypes IPB002003, IPB002046, IPB009019 and Tit Super, whereas IPB009002 and Tombak were categorized as those of dynamic stability. Genotype IPB120005 and IPB019015 were less adaptable in the multiple environments tested. It shows that the genotypes were specific in certain environments. IPB120005 had high yield and specific location in Boyolali in dry season and IPB019015 genotype was specific in Bogor in wet season.

 

Keywords: chili pepper, nonparametric stability, high yield, dynamic stablility



Full Text:

PDF

References


Akcura, M and Y. Kaya. 2008. Nonparametric stability methods for interpreting genotipe by environment interaction of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics and Molecular Biology 31: 906-913.

Annacchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype x environment interaction, challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unites Nations. pp.105.

Aryana, I.G.P.M. 2009. Adaptation and yield stability of red rice line in three growing environments. J Agron Indonesia. 37 (2): 95-100

Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russel.1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6: 36-40.

Finlay, K.W. and G.N. Wilkinson.1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14: 742-754.

Francis, T.R. and L.W. Kannenberg.1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. A descriptive method for grouping geno-types. Can J Plant Sci. 58: 1029-1034.

Fox, P.N., B.K. Skovmand, H.J. Braun and R. Comier. 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Eupthyca 47: 57-64.

Huehn, M. 1990. Non parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Eupthyca 7: 189-194

Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analtsis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci 46 : 1488-1500.

Kang, M.S. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res Comm 16: 113-115.

Nasrullah, 1981. A Modified procedure for identifying varietal stability. Agric Sci. 3(4): 153-159.

Nassar, R. and M. Huehn. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability : test of significance for parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometric 43: 45-53.

Mattjik, A.A., I.M. Sumertajaya, A.F. Hadi, and G.N.A. Wibawa. 2011. Additive Main-effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) Modeling : present and future (in Indonesia). Bogor : IPB Press. 271p.

Mohammadi, R., A. Abdulahi, R. Haghoarast, M. Aghaee, and M. Rostaee. 2007. Non-parametric methods for evaluating of winter wheat genotypes in multi-environment trial. Agric.Sci.3(2):137-242.

Mohammadi, R. and A. Amri. 2008. Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environ-ments. Eupthyca 159: 419-255.

Mut, Z., N. Aydin, H.O. Bayramoglu and H. Ozcan. 2009. Interpreting genotipe x environment interaction in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotipes using nonparametric measures. Turk J Agric 33: 127-137

Sabaghnia,N.,H.Dehghani and S.H.Sabaghpour. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotipe x environment interaction of lentil genotipes. Crop Sci 46: 1100-1106.

Satoto, S.T.W. Utomo, Y. Widyastuti and I.A. Rumanti. 2009. Submission of release for new hybrid rice variety H45, H47, H64, H68 and H78. [Paper of Variety Release on Trial]. Subang : Balai Besar Penelitian Padi. pp.20.

Sujiprihati, S. M. Syukur and R. Yunianti. 2006. The analysis of stability of seven sweet corn populations using Additive Main Effect Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) (In Indonesia). Bul. Agron 34(2): 93-97.

Thennarasu, K. 1995. On certain non parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stabilitiy [Thesis]. New Delhi : PJ School, IARI. pp.54.

Zulhayana, S. 2010. Classification of genotypes with index stability nonparemetric (In Indonesia) [tesis]. Post Graduate Program, Bogor Agricultural Universty. pp.41.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v35i2.273

Copyright (c)