Sustainability Status of Peatland in Different Types of Land Use

Rahmah Dewi Yustika, Setyono Yudo Tyasmoro, Suratman Suratman

Abstract


Peatlands are fragile ecosystems, making any utilization susceptible to changes that can disrupt the balance of natural resources and the environment. Three critical aspects that play a significant role in preserving peatland ecosystems (ecological, economic, and social) must be carefully considered in peatland use. A study of biophysical data and peatland usage was conducted in Pelalawan District, Riau Province, Indonesia, followed by a quantitative analysis of sustainability using Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) with the support of modified Rapfish software, referred to as Rapid Appraisal for Peat (RapPeat). The study aimed to assess the sustainability level of various peatland land use types and identify leverage attributes for targeted interventions to improve sustainability status. The research findings suggest that the peatland areas are less sustainable across these three assessed dimensions. The ecological dimension was the most sustainable, followed by the economic and social dimensions. Rubber and oil palm plantation land use types are more sustainable than the other land use types. Improving peatland sustainability involves targeted actions on leverage attributes to facilitate more sustainable practices across all dimensions.

Keywords


MDS analysis; Peat ecosystems dimension; Peatland management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustira, M. A., Rañola Jr., R. F., Sajise, A. J. U., & Florece, L. M. (2015). Economic impacts of smallholder oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) plantations on peatlands in Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, 1(2), 105–123. https://jemad.cem.uplb.edu.ph/articles/economic-impacts-of-smallholder-oil-palm-elaeis-guineensis-jacq-plantations-on-peatlands-in-indonesia/

Andriany, Fahruddin, & Abdullah, A. (2018). Pengaruh jenis bioaktivator terhadap laju dekomposisi seresah daun jati Tectona grandis L.f., di wilayah kampus Unhas Tamalanrea. BIOMA: Jurnal Biologi Makassar, 3(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.20956/bioma.v3i2.5820

Baccini, A., Walker, W., Carvalho, L., Farina, M., Sulla-Menashe, D., & Houghton, R. A. (2017). Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science, 358, 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5962

Barchia, M. F., Ishak, A., Utama, S. P., & Novanda, R. R. (2021). Sustainability status of paddy cultivation on marginal peat soils in indonesia. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27(2), 259–270. https://journal.agrojournal.org/page/en/details.php?article_id=3320

Basuki, I., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., & Anshari, G. Z. (2016). Carbon stocks and emissions from degradation and conversion of tropical peat swamp forests in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. 15th International Peat Congress, September, 260–263. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22826.21445

Bonn, A., Allot, T., Evans, M., Joosten, H., & Stoneman, R. (2016). Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: An Introduction. In A. Bonn, T. Allott, M. Evans, H. Joosten, & R. Stoneman (Eds.), Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services (p. 16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177788.002

Chapman, S., Buttler, A., Francez, A.-J., Laggoun-Defarge, F., Vasander, H., Schloter, M., Combe, J., Grosvernier, P., Harms, H., Epron, D., Gilbert, D., & Mitchell, E. (2003). Exploitation of northern peatlands and biodiversity maintenance: a conflict between economy and ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(10), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0525:EONPAB]2.0.CO;2

Clarke, D., & Rieley, J. O. (2019). Strategy for Responsible Peatland Management (6th ed.). International Peatland Society.

Crowder, S., Delker, C., Forrest, E., & Martin, N. (2020). Monte Carlo methods for the propagation of uncertainties. In S. Crowder, C. Delker, E. Forrest, & N. Martin, Introduction to Statistics in Metrology (pp. 153–180). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53329-8_8

Deshmukh, C. S., Julius, D., Desai, A. R., Asyhari, A., Page, S. E., Nardi, N., Susanto, A. P., Nurholis, N., Hendrizal, M., Kurnianto, S., Suardiwerianto, Y., Salam, Y. W., Agus, F., Astiani, D., Sabiham, S., Gauci, V., & Evans, C. D. (2021). Conservation slows down emission increase from a tropical peatland in Indonesia. Nature Geoscience, 14(7), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00785-2

Fahly, A. P., Fauzi, A., Juanda, B., & Rustiadi, E. (2024). Sustainability evaluation of regency development in peatland areas of Riau Province, Indonesia. Challenges in Sustainability, 12(2), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.56578/cis120202

Glenk, K., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2018). The economics of peatland restoration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2018.1434562

Goldstein, A., Turner, W. R., Spawn, S. A., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Cook-Patton, S., Fargione, J., Gibbs, H. K., Griscom, B., Hewson, J. H., Howard, J. F., Ledezma, J. C., Page, S., Koh, L. P., Rockström, J., Sanderman, J., & Hole, D. G. (2020). Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems. Nature Climate Change, 10(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0738-8

Hamid, I., Nugroho, A. R., Mahyuni, M., Muzaki, R. I., Fadiya, N. K., & Indrawan, I. (2023). The way of life and ecological thinking of the Jambu Baru community as a foundation for sustainable peatland management. Jambura Geo Education Journal, 4(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.34312/jgej.v4i2.21703

Hardiansyah, G., Junaidi, Yusro, F., Mariani, Y., Roslinda, E., Kusrini, N., Diba, F., Oktoriana, S., Erianto, Iskandar, Burhanuddin, Pranoto, D. Y. B., Ekawati, S., Silviani, Surati, Ramawati, Prasetyo, B. D., Handoyo, Charity, D., … Nurdwiansyah, D. (2022). A study of sustainable peat cultivation implemented by the community of Tumbang Nusa Village, Central Kalimantan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1025(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1025/1/012005

Helmina, M. R. A., Susilowati, P. I. M., & Misran, A. (2022). SWOT analysis of peatland utilization assessment for community (Case study at Banjar Regency of South Kalimantan). Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.20527/jwem.v10i1.277

Joosten, H. (2024). Peatland must be wet: Advance rewetting, stop peat extraction. In K. Wiegandt (Ed.), 3 Degrees More (pp. 179–203). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58144-1_9

Kamal, M. A., Utomo, M. R., Hakim, M. L., Qurbani, I. D., & Ikram, A. D. (2023). Peatland management based on local wisdom through rural governance improvement and agroindustry. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(3), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i3.486

Kanter, D. R., Schwoob, M. H., Baethgen, W. E., Bervejillo, J. E., Carriquiry, M., Dobermann, A., Ferraro, B., Lanfranco, B., Mondelli, M., Penengo, C., Saldias, R., Silva, M. E., & de Lima, J. M. S. (2016). Translating the Sustainable Development Goals into action: A participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways. Global Food Security, 10, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.002

Kelly, C., Ferrara, A., Wilson, G. A., Ripullone, F., Nolè, A., Harmer, N., & Salvati, L. (2015). Community resilience and land degradation in forest and shrubland socio-ecological systems: Evidence from Gorgoglione, Basilicata, Italy. Land Use Policy, 46, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.026

Kolay, P. K., & Taib, S. N. L. (2018). Physical and geotechnical properties of tropical peat and its stabilization. In B. Topcuoğlu & M. Turan (Eds.), Peat. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74173

Le, T.-A. T., Vodden, K., Wu, J., & Atiwesh, G. (2023). Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management, 2, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsrma.2023.1129396

Lees, K. J., Carmenta, R., Condliffe, I., Gray, A., Marquis, L., & Lenton, T. M. (2023). Protecting peatlands requires understanding stakeholder perceptions and relational values: A case study of peatlands in the Yorkshire Dales. Ambio, 52(7), 1282–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01850-3

Lestari, Y., & Mukhlis. (2021). Peatland water conservation by agroforestry system. E3S Web of Conferences, 305(03004). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130503004

Lin, H., Zhuang, Z., Ma, T., Sun, X., Huang, X., & Li, Y. (2018). A meta-analysis of randomized control trials assessing mesh fixation with glue versus suture in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Medicine, 97(14), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010227

Meemken, E. M., Barrett, C. B., Michelson, H. C., Qaim, M., Reardon, T., & Sellare, J. (2021). Sustainability standards in global agrifood supply chains. Nature Food, 2, 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00360-3

Miettinen, J., Hooijer, A., Vernimmen, R., Liew, S. C., & Page, S. E. (2017). From carbon sink to carbon source: Extensive peat oxidation in insular Southeast Asia since 1990. Environmental Research Letters, 12(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5b6f

Napreenko, M., Danchenkov, A., Napreenko-Dorokhova, T., & Samerkhanova, A. (2023). Vegetation mapping in drained peatlands for the carbon research objectives: A case study from Kaliningrad Region. Mires and Peat, 29(19), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2022.OMB.Sc.2020811

Nursyamsi, D., Noor, M., & Maftu’ah, E. (2016). Peatland Management for Sustainable Agriculture. In M. Osaki & N. Tsuji (Eds.), Tropical Peatland Ecosystems (pp. 493–511). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55681-7

Octavia, D., Murniati, Suharti, S., Hani, A., Mindawati, N., Suratman, Swestiani, D., Junaedi, A., Undaharta, N. K. E., Santosa, P. B., Wahyuningtyas, R. S., & Faubiany, V. (2023). Smart agroforestry for sustaining soil fertility and community livelihood. Forest Science and Technology, 19(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2023.2269970

Pannell, D. J., Llewellyn, R. S., & Corbeels, M. (2014). The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187(April), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.014

Pitcher, T. J. (1999). Rapfish, a rapid appraisal technique for fisheries, and its application to the code of conduct for responsible fisheries. In FAO Fisheries Cicular (Issue 947). http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/X4175E/X4175E00.HTM

Pitcher, T. J., Lam, M. E., Ainsworth, C., Martindale, A., Nakamura, K., Perry, R. I., & Ward, T. (2013). Improvements to Rapfish: A rapid evaluation technique for fisheries integrating ecological and human dimensions. Journal of Fish Biology, 83(4), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12122

Renou-Wilson, F., Moser, G., Fallon, D., Farrell, C. A., Müller, C., & Wilson, D. (2019). Rewetting degraded peatlands for climate and biodiversity benefits: Results from two raised bogs. Ecological Engineering, 127, 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.014

Ritzema, H., Limin, S., Kusin, K., Jauhiainen, J., & Wösten, H. (2014). Canal blocking strategies for hydrological restoration of degraded tropical peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Catena, 114, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.009

Sakuntaladewi, N., Rachmanadi, D., Mendham, D., Yuwati, T. W., Winarno, B., Premono, B. T., Lestari, S., Ardhana, A., Ramawati, Budiningsih, K., Hidayat, D. C., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Can we simultaneously restore peatlands and improve livelihoods? Exploring community home yard innovations in utilizing degraded peatland. Land, 11(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020150

Sanudin, Fauziyah, E., Widyaningsih, T. S., Harianja, A. H., & Widiyanto, A. (2023). Role of actors in promoting sustainable peatland management in Kubu Raya Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Open Agriculture, 8(1), 20220198. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0198

Silviana, S. H., Saharjo, B. H., & Sutikno, S. (2021). Distribution of carbon stocks in drainage areas on peatlands of Sungai Tohor Village, Meranti Islands District, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 22(11), 5106–5114. https://doi.org/10.13057/BIODIV/D221149

Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. In Soil Conservation Service (12th ed.). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Subardja, D., Ritung, S., Anda, M., Sukarman, Suryani, E., & Subandiono, R. E. (2016). Petunjuk Teknis Klasifikasi Tanah Nasional (Hikmatullah, Suparto, C. Tafakresnanto, Suratman, & K. Nugroho (eds.); Kedua). Balai Besar Litbang Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1c95fppRDYRtfnQhMl9TuKbcRf-jQcQk6/view

Tasker, T. J., & Cisneroz, A. (2019). Open-Ended Questions in Qualitative Research. In C. H. Bohan (Ed.), Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue (pp. 119–122). Information Age Publishing.

Trubins, R. (2023). Trade-offs in ecosystem services: Clarifying concepts and measuring severity within the production possibility frontier framework. Sustainability, 15(24), 16763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416763

Uda, S. K., Hein, L., & Sumarga, E. (2017). Towards sustainable management of Indonesian tropical peatlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 25(6), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9544-0

Uddin, J., Mohiuddin, A. S. M., & Hassan, M. (2019). Organic carbon storage in the tropical peat soils and its impact on climate change. American Journal of Climate Change, 8, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.81006

United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Economics of Peatlands Conservation , Restoration and Sustainable Management - A Policy Report for the Global Peatlands Initiative (E. B. Barbier & J. C. Burgess (eds.)). United Nations Environment Programme.

Wang Mei Hua, M., Warren-Thomas, E., & Cherico Wanger, T. (2021). Rubber agroforestry: Feasibility at scale. Mighty Earth. https://www.mightyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/Agroforestry-rubber-report-5.18.21.pdf

Widiastuti, D. P., Hatta, M., Aziz, H., Permana, D., Santari, P. T., Rohaeni, E. S., Ahmad, S. N., Bakrie, B., Tan, S. S., & Rakhmani, S. I. W. (2024). Peatlands management for sustainable use on the integration of maize and cattle in a circular agriculture system in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(10), e31259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31259

Word, C. S., McLaughlin, D. L., Strahm, B. D., Stewart, R. D., Varner, J. M., Wurster, F. C., Amestoy, T. J., & Link, N. T. (2022). Peatland drainage alters soil structure and water retention properties: Implications for ecosystem function and management. Hydrological Processes, 36(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14533

Yusuf, M., Fahrudin, A., Kusmana, C., & Kamal, M. M. (2016). Analisis faktor penentu dalam pengelolaan berkelanjutan estuaria DAS Tallo. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan, 13(1), 41–51. http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1380

Zulkarnaini, Sujianto, & Wawan. (2022). Short Communication: Sustainability of ecological dimension in peatland management in The Giam Siak Kecil Bukit Batu Landscape, Riau, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 23(4), 1822–1827. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230414




DOI: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v47i2.4734

Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.