Long-Term Biofertilizers and Chemical Fertilizer Use on Selected Peat Soil Properties of Oil Palm Plantation

Nur Qursyna Boll Kassim, Norazlina Abu Sari, Nur Maizatul Idayu Othman, Muhammad Nuruddin Mohd Nor, Salwa Adam, Nurul Wahida Hani, Muhammad Luqman bin Alias

Abstract


Fertilizer plays a crucial role in the field of plantation industries. In pursuit of the sustainable development goals, the objective of this study is to analyse and compare the specific physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of peat soils found in oil palm between biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer treated plot. This study involved approximately 40 soil samples at Ladang Amanah Saham Pahang Berhad (ASPA), located in Sg. Miang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia. Block E and Block F were chosen to represent the biofertilizer (Plot E3) and chemical fertilizer (Plot F4). The samples were collected during Mid-June 2023 using random sampling techniques and prepared for soil chemical and biological analysis. Based on the findings, there were significant differences in soil pH, exchangeable phosphorus (P), ammonium-N (NH4+) and nitrate-N (NO3-) between chemical fertilizer and biofertilizer treated plot. Biofertilizer treated plot showed higher levels of total nitrogen (N), total carbon, exchangeable calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) compared to chemical fertilizer treated plot. Chemical fertilizer treated plot showed lower cation exchange capacity (CEC) compared to biofertilizer treated plot Accordingly, this research suggested that peat soils' pH, available P, ammonium, and nitrate content were significantly affected by the long-term use of biofertilizer for oil palm plantations.

Keywords


Biofertilizer; Fertility; Oil palm; Peat soil; Sustainable

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agus, C., Ilfana, Z. R., Azmi, F. F., Rachmanadi, D., Widiyatno, Wulandari, D., Santosa, P. B., Harun, M. K., Yuwati, T. W. & Lestari, T. (2020). The effect of tropical peat land-use changes on plant diversity and soil properties. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17, 1703-1712. DOI

Ajeng, A. A., Abdullah, R., Malek, M. A., Chew, K. W., Ho, Y. C., Ling, T. C., Lau, B. F. & Show, P. L. (2020). The effects of biofertilizers on growth, soil fertility, and nutrients uptake of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) under greenhouse conditions. Processes, 8, 1681. DOI

Asoegwu, C. R., Awuchi, C. G., Nelson, K., C. T., Orji, C. G., Nwosu, O. U., Egbufor, U. C., & Awuchi, C. G. (2020). A review on the role of biofertilizers in reducing soil pollution and increasing soil nutrients. Himalayan Journal of Agriculture, 1(1). website

Chaudhari, P. R., Ahire, D. V., Ahire, V. D., Chkravarty, M., & Maity, S. (2013). Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(2), 1-8. website

Coleman-Derr, D., & Tringe, S. G. (2014). Building the crops of tomorrow: advantages of symbiont-based approaches to improving abiotic stress tolerance. Frontiers In Microbiology, 5, 283. DOI

Ding, X., Han, X., Liang, Y., Qiao, Y., Li, L., & Li, N. (2012). Changes in soil organic carbon pools after 10 years of continuous manuring combined with chemical fertilizer in a Mollisol in China. Soil and Tillage Research, 122, 36-41. DOI

González Jiménez, J. L., Healy, M. G., & Daly, K. (2019). Effects of fertiliser on phosphorus pools in soils with contrasting organic matter content: A fractionation and path analysis study. Geoderma, 338, 128–135. DOI

Gusmayanti, E., Anshari, G. Z., Pramulya, M., & Ruliyansyah, A. (2019). CO2 fluxes from drained tropical peatland used for oil palm plantation in relation to peat characteristics and crop age after planting. Biodiversitas, 20(6), 1650-1657. DOI

Hashim, S. A., Teh, C. B. S., & Ahmed, O. H. (2019). Influence of water table depths, nutrients leaching losses, subsidence of tropical peat soil and oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedling growth. Malaysian Journal of Soil Science, 23, 13-30. PDF

Inubushi, K., Otake, S., Furukawa, Y., Shibasaki, N., Ali, M., Itang, A. M., & Tsuruta, H. (2005). Factors influencing methane emission from peat soils: Comparison of tropical and temperate wetlands. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 71, 93-99. DOI

Kassim, N. Q. B., & Yaacob, A. (2019). Nutrients dynamics in peat soil: Influence of fluctuating water table. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 327(1), 012024. DOI

Kassim, N. Q. B., & Yaacob, A. (2020). Quantification of Soil N, P and K balance in peat soils: Influence of fluctuating water table. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 917(1), 012018. DOI

Kubheka, B. P., Laing, M. D., & Yobo, K. S. (2020). Combinations of a biofertilizer with micro-dosed chemical fertilizers increased yield of maize in a high acid saturated soil. Rhizosphere, 13, 100189. DOI

Kumar, P., Brar, S., Pandove, G., & Aulakh, C. (2021). Bioformulation of Azotobacter spp. and Streptomyces badius on the productivity, economics, and energetics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Energy, 232, 120868. DOI

Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009). Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 63, 541-556. DOI

Mitter, E. K., Tosi, M., Obregón, D., Dunfield, K. E., & Germida, J. J. (2021). Rethinking crop nutrition in times of modern microbiology: Innovative biofertilizer technologies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 606815. DOI

MPOB. (2022). Malaysian Oil Palm Statistics 2021 41st Edition. Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Kuala Lumpur.

Nosheen, S., Ajmal, I., & Song, Y. (2021). Microbes as biofertilizers, a potential approach for sustainable crop production. Sustainability, 13, 1868. DOI

Othman, N. M. I., Othman, R., Zuan, A. T. K., Shamsuddin, A. S., Zaman, N. B. K., Sari, N. A., & Panhwar, Q. A. (2022). Isolation, characterization, and identification of zinc-solubilizing bacteria (ZSB) from wetland rice fields in Peninsular Malaysia. Agriculture, 12, 1823. DOI

Pahalvi, H. N., Rafiya, L., Rashid, S., Nisar, B., & Kamili, A. N. (2021). Chemical Fertilizers and Their Impact on Soil Health in Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol 2 (pp. 1–20). Springer International Publishing. DOI

Rao, N. S. S. (1982). Biofertilizers. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 7(3), 220–229. DOI

Schmidt, J. E., & Gaudin, A. C. M. (2018). What is the agronomic potential of biofertilizers for maize? A meta-analysis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 94, fiy094. DOI

Shi, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Xu, Z., He, C., Sheng, L., Liu, H. & Wang, Z. (2021). Shift in nitrogen transformation in peatland soil by nitrogen inputs. Science of the Total Environment, 764, 142924. DOI

Suhag, M. (2016). Potential of biofertilizers to replace chemical fertilizers. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(5), 163-167. PDF

Trivedi, P., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Trivedi, C., Hamonts, K., Anderson, I. C., & Singh, B. K. (2017). Keystone microbial taxa regulate the invasion of a fungal pathogen in agro-ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 111, 10-14. DOI

Wetlands International. (2010). A quick scan of peatlands in Malaysia. Wetlands International Malaysia: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. 74 pp.

Zainuddin, N., Keni, M. F., Ibrahim, S. A. S., & Masri, M. M. M. (2022). Effect of integrated biofertilizers with chemical fertilizers on the oil palm growth and soil microbial diversity. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 39, 102237. DOI




DOI: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v46i2.4305

Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.