Alteration of the Rhizosphere Bacteria Community Respond Differently to Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Peanut Soil’s Poteran Island

Ida Ekawati, Henny Diana Wati, Maharani Pertiwi Koentjoro, Herni Sudarwati, Isdiantoni Isdiantoni, Endry Nugroho Prasetyo

Abstract


Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) has been detailed to affect soil microbial exercises or community composition. There is a lack of information on the degree to which PGPR as a biofertilizer concurrently influences the action, estimate, and composition of the soil microbial community. This research investigated the impacts of the timing and frequency of PGPR application as biofertilizers on the rhizosphere bacteria community in arable soil. We compared four treatments in an experimental field site, namely: one-time treatment of PGPR at the beginning of planting (P1), twice treatment of PGPR (P2), 15-days of planting (DP), and 30-DP (P3); and without treatment of PGPR (WP). A total rhizosphere bacteria community fingerprint was surveyed using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) using a culture-dependent and culture-independent approach. The rhizosphere bacteria community was surveyed during 80 DP. The unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering showed that the rhizosphere bacteria community in three-frequency applications of PGPR was more abundant than without PGPR application and one or two PGPR applications. This study revealed that the rhizosphere bacteria community was increased in soil with PGPR application, especially in P3, three dosages of PGPR application. Increasing the rhizosphere bacteria community could strongly influence the clay foam soil nutrient.

Keywords


Bacteria community; Biofertilizer; Plant soil's response; Poteran rhizosphere

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anka, L. M. (2021). Role of soil in agriculture. Global Science Research Journals, 9(3), 1.

Bertola, M., Ferrarini, A., & Visioli, G. (2021). Improvement of Soil Microbial Diversity through Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Its Evaluation by-Omics Approaches: A Perspective for the Environment, Food Quality and Human Safety. Microorganisms, 9(7), 1400. DOI

Bhattacharyya, D., Duta, S., Yu, S.-M., Jeong, S. C., & Lee, Y. H. (2018). Taxonomic and Functional Changes of Bacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere of Kimchi Cabbage After Seed Bacterization with Proteus vulgaris JBLS202. The Plant Pathology Journal, 34(4), 286–296. DOI

Correia, L. T., Suarna, I. W., Suryani, N. N., & Cakra, I. G. L. O. (2021). Effect of Different Dosage and Application Frequency of Liquid Organic Fertilizer in Dwarf Elephant Grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott) to Ecological Characteristic of Vertisol Soil in Timor Leste. International Journal of Life Sciences, 5(2), 118–124.

Dębska, B., Długosz, J., Piotrowska-Długosz, A., & Banach-Szott, M. (2016). The impact of a bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration—results from a field-scale study. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(10), 2335–2343. DOI

Demir, Z. (2020). Effects of microbial bio-fertilizers on soil physicochemical properties under different soil water regimes in greenhouse grown eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(14), 1888–1903. DOI

Fang, X., Zhu, Y.-L., Liu, J.-D., Lin, X.-P., Sun, H.-Z., Tang, X.-H., Hu, Y.-L., Huang, Y.-P., & Yi, Z.-G. (2022). Effects of moisture and temperature on soil organic carbon decomposition along a vegetation restoration gradient of subtropical china. Forests, 13(4), 578. DOI

Faridvand, S., Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Battaglia, M. L., Gitari, H. I., Raza, M. A., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2021). Application of bio and chemical fertilizers improves yield, and essential oil quantity and quality of Moldavian balm (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) intercropped with mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Food and Energy Security, 11(2), e319. DOI

Fomina, M., & Skorochod, I. (2020). Microbial interaction with clay minerals and its environmental and biotechnological implications. Minerals, 10, 861. DOI

Fracchia, L., Perotti, E. B. R., Pidello, A., Rinaldi, M., & Martinotti, M. G. (2011). Persistence and Impact of a PGPR on Microbial Communities of Biosolids and Soil Amended with Them. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 5, 578–595.

Hemkemeyer, M., Dohrmann, A. B., Christensen, B. T., & Tebbe, C. C. (2018). Bacterial preferences for specific soil particle size fractions revealed by community analyses. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 149. DOI

Iqbal, M. A., Khalid, M., Shahzad, S. M., Ahmad, M., Soleman, N., & Akhtar, N. (2012). Integrated use of Rhizobium leguminosarum, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and enriched compost for improving growth, nodulation and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 72(1), 104–110. DOI

Joko, T., Koentjoro, M. P., Somowiyarjo, S., Rohman, M. S., Liana, A., & Ogawa, N. (2012). Response of rhizobacterial communities in watermelon to infection with cucumber green mottle mosaic virus as revealed by cultivation-dependent RISA. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 45(15), 1810–1818. DOI

Kumari, N., & Mohan, C. (2021). Basics of Clay Minerals and Their Characteristic Properties. In G. M. Do Nascimento (Ed.), Clay and Clay Minerals. IntechOpen. DOI

Li, H., Penttinen, P., Mikkonen, A., Stoddard, F. L., & Lindström, K. (2020). Response of Soil Bacterial Community Diversity and Composition to Time, Fertilization, and Plant Species in a Sub-Boreal Climate. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1780. DOI

Mohammad, A. O. (2015). Assessing changes in soil microbial population with some soil physical and chemical properties. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 5(3), 117-123.

Pagnani, G., Galieni, A., Stagnari, F., Pellegrini, M., Del Gallo, M., & Pisante, M. (2020). Open field inoculation with PGPR as a strategy to manage fertilization of ancient Triticum genotypes. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 56(1), 111–124. DOI

Pereira, S. I. A., Abreu, D., Moreira, H., Vega, A., & Castro, P. M. L. (2020). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improve the growth and nutrient use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. Heliyon, 6(10), e05106. DOI

Piromyou, P., Noisangiam, R., Uchiyama, H., Tittabutr, P., Boonkerd, N., & Teaumroong, N. (2013). Indigenous Microbial Community Structure in Rhizosphere of Chinese Kale as Affected by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculation. Pedosphere, 23(5), 577–592. DOI

Renoud, S., Abrouk, D., Prigent-Combaret, C., Wisniewski-Dyé, F., Legendre, L., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., & Muller, D. (2022). Effect of Inoculation Level on the Impact of the PGPR Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1 on Selected Microbial Functional Groups in the Rhizosphere of Field Maize. Microorganisms, 10, 325. DOI

Sedri, M. H., Niedbała, G., Roohi, E., Niazian, M., Szulc, P., Rahmani, H. A., & Fieziasl, V. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Plant Growth-PromotingRhizobacteria (PGPR) and Chemical Fertilizers on Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Rainfed Wheat. Agronomy, 12(7), 1524. DOI

South, K. A., Nordstedt, N. P., & Jones, M. L. (2021). Identification of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria That Improve the Performance of Greenhouse-Grown Petunias under Low Fertility Conditions. Plants, 10, 1410. DOI

Tang, X., Zhong, R., Jiang, J., He, L., Huang, Z., Shi, G., Wu, H., Liu, J., Xiong, F., Han, Z., Tang, R., & He, L. (2020). Cassava/peanut intercropping improves soil quality via rhizospheric microbes increased available nitrogen contents. BMC Biotechnology, 20, 13. DOI

Tatas, Budipriyanto, A., Khoiri, M., Lestari, W., & Rahman, A. (2015). Study on Water Balance in Poteran – A Small Island in East Java, Indonesia. Procedia Engineering, 125, 236–242. DOI

Tsai, Y., Baldwin, S. A., Siang, L. C., & Gopaluni, B. (2019). A Comparison of Clustering and Prediction Methods for Identifying Key Chemical–Biological Features Affecting Bioreactor Performance. Processes, 7(9), 614. DOI

Winand, R., Bogaerts, B., Hoffman, S., Lefevre, L., Delvoye, M., Van Braekel, J., Fu, Q., Roosens, N. H. C., De Keersmaecker, S. C. J., & Vanneste, K. (2020). Targeting the 16s rRNA gene for bacterial identification in complex mixed samples: Comparative evaluation of second (Illumina) and third (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) generation sequencing technologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, 298. DOI




DOI: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v46i3.3947

Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.