Yields of Promising Sugarcane Clones under Three Different Planting Arrangements

Prima Diarini Riajaya, Djumali Djumali, Bambang Heliyanto


A field experiment was conducted at Kediri, East Java, to examine the influence of row spacing on the yield of five promising clones from August 2018-June 2020. The investigation was of a Split-Plot design with three replications. The main plot consisted of three planting arrangements: SR, single row spacing at 110 cm, DR1, double rows spacing 50+135 cm, and DR2, double rows spacing 50+170 cm. Sub-plots consisted of five promising clones and one check variety: MLG 5, MLG 9, MLG 14, MLG 52, MLG 55, and PS 881. The results suggest no overall significant effect of planting arrangement on sugar yield, though clones may vary. There are significant differences in yield between some clones. Wider rows, DR2, show the highest yield in tonnes of cane per hectare (TCH) in PC (153.94 t/ha) with a slight decrease (14%) in RC-1 due to reduced plant population. Sugar yield in tonnes of sugar per hectare (TSH) in various planting arrangements ranges from 12.26-13.99 t/ha in PC and 10.68-11.93 t/ha in RC-1. MLG 9 can be released as a new variety with high cane and sugar yields. 


Planting system; Sugar content; Sugar yield; Sugarcane yield

Full Text:



Acreche, M. M., Saez, J. V., & Chalco Vera, J. (2015). Physiological bases of genetic gains in sugarcane yield in Argentina. Field Crops Research, 175(April 2015), 80–86. DOI

Allison, J. C. S., Pammenter, N. W., & Haslam, R. J. (2007). Why does sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrid) grow slowly? South African Journal of Botany, 73(4), 546–551. DOI

Bell, M. J., & Garside, A. L. (2005). Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia. Field Crops Research, 92(2-3), 231–248. DOI

Cabral, D. N. A., Nunes, J. A. R., Cabral, P. D. S., Zuchi, J., Raizer, A. J., & De Paula, T. O. M. (2017). Implications of the clone by harvest interaction in the selection of sugarcane genotypes in a regionalized program. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16(2), gmr16029660. DOI

Cardozo, N. P., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2013). Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Scientia Agricola, 70(6), 449–456. DOI

Chumphu, S., Jongrungklang, N., & Songsri, P. (2019). Association of physiological responses and root distribution patterns of ratooning ability and yield of the second ratoon cane in sugarcane elite clones. Agronomy, 9(4), 200. DOI

Djumali, D., Khuluq, A. D., & Mulyaningsih, S. (2016). Pertumbuhan dan produktivitas tebu pada beberapa paket tata tanam di lahan kering. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia, 44(2), 211–220.

Dlamini, M. M., & Olaleye, A. O. (2019). Effects of plant density and fertiliser rates on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) growth, sucrose yield and quality in Swaziland. Proceedings of the Annual Congress-South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, 92, 179–199. PDF

Dumont, T., Thong-Chane, A., Barau, L., Siegmund, B., & Hoarau, J.-Y. (2019). Genetic variabilities and genetic gains for yield components in regional sugarcane breeding programmes on Réunion Island. Sugar Tech, 21(6), 868–878. DOI

Endres, L., Silva, J. V, Ferreira, V. M., & Barbosa, G. V. de S. (2010). Photosynthesis and water relations in Brazilian sugarcane. The Open Agriculture Journal, 4(1), 31–37. DOI

Ferreira Junior, R. A., Souza, J. L. de, Lyra, G. B., Escobedo, J. F., & Santos, M. V. C. (2015). Energy conversion efficiency in sugarcane under two row spacings in northeast of Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola E Ambiental, 19(8), 741–747. DOI

Goes, T., Marra, R., de Araújo, M., Alves, E., & Souza, M. O. de. (2011). Sugarcane in Brazil Current technologic stage and perspectives. Revista de Política Agrícola, 20(1), 52–65.

Gomathi, R., Rao, P. N. G., Rakkiyappan, P., Sundara, B. P., & Shiyamala, S. (2013). Physiological studies on ratoonability of sugarcane varieties under tropical Indian condition. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(2), 274–281. DOI

Guerra, E. P., Augusto De Oliveira, R., Daros, E., Luís, J., Zambon, C., Teruyo Ido, O., Filho, B. (2009). EP Guerra et al. Brazilian Society of Plant Breeding. Printed in Brazil Stability and adaptability of early maturing sugarcane clones by AMMI analysis. In Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology (Vol. 9). website

Hase, C. P. (2019). Yield attributes and yields of sugarcane under monoculturing. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 12(7), 45–72. website

Hassan, M.-U.-, Fiaz, N., Mudassir, M. A., & Yasin, M. (2017). Exploring the ratooning potential of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes under varying harvesting times of plant crop. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 30(3), 303–309. DOI

Jones, H. G. (1998). Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany, 49(Special Issue), 387–398. DOI

Keshavaiah, K. V., & Devaraju, K. M. (2015). Wide row planting in sugarcane-new Vistas for augmenting cane production. Asian Journal of Biological and Life Sciences, 4(1), 59–64.

Khandagave, R. B. (2010). Agronomic management of intercropping in sugarcane and its economic implications. Proceedings International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 27, 1–5. PDF

Luo, J., Pan, Y.-B., Xu, L., Grisham, M. P., Zhang, H., & Que, Y. (2015). Rational regional distribution of sugarcane cultivars in China. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 15721. DOI

Marin, F. R., Rattalino Edreira, J. I., Andrade, J., & Grassini, P. (2019). On-farm sugarcane yield and yield components as influenced by number of harvests. Field Crops Research, 240(July 2019), 134–142. DOI

Maruthi, M., Krishnamurthy, D., Ramesh, Y. M., Chittapur, B. M., & Gaddi, A. (2019). Growth, sugar yield, quality and economics of sugarcane under different establishment techniques and planting geometries. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(11), 485–493. DOI

Masri, M. I., & Amien, M. M. M. (2015). Yield potential and ratooning ability of some sugar cane genotypes. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 7(8), 262–274. DOI

Medeiros, D. B., Silva, E. C. da, Nogueira, R. J. M. C., Teixeira, M. M., & Buckeridge, M. S. (2013). Physiological limitations in two sugarcane varieties under water suppression and after recovering. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 25(3), 213–222. DOI

Mohammed, A. K., Ishaq, M. N., Gana, A. K., & Agboire, S. (2019). Evaluation of sugarcane hybrid clones for cane and sugar yield in Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(1), 34–39. DOI

Nuñez, O., & Palomeque, J. D. (2016). Sugarcane performance under different row configurations designed to accommodate in-field traffic. 29(October 2016), 1100–1103. DOI

Palachai, C. H., Songsri, P., & Jongrungklang, N. (2019). Comparison of yield components of sugarcane varities grown under natural short-and longterm water-logged conditions in Thailand. Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 51(1), 80–92. PDF

Riajaya, P. D., Djumali, D., & Heliyanto, B. (2020). Uji ketahanan klon-klon harapan tebu terhadap kekeringan. Buletin Tanaman Tembakau, Serat & Minyak Industri, 12(1), 1–11. DOI

Riajaya, P. D., Mastur, Fitriningdyah Tri Kadarwati, Djumali, Sholeh, M., Mulyaningsih, S., & Suhara, C. (2012). Evaluasi hidrologi pengembangan tebu lahan kering di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Sampang. Laporan Kerjasama antara Dinas Perkebunan Provinsi Jawa Timur dengan Balittas. Koleksi Perpustakaan Balittas.

Samiullah, S., Ehsanullah, S., Anjum, S. A., Raza, M., Hussain, N., Nadeem, M., & Ali, N. (2015). Studies on productivity and performance of spring sugarcane sown in different planting configurations. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6(19), 2984–2988. DOI

Supriyadi, S., Khuluq, A. D., & Djumali, D. (2018). Pertumbuhan, produktivitas dan hasil hablur klon tebu masak awal-tengah di tanah Inceptisol. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 46(2), 208–214. DOI

Terauchi, T., Irei, S., Terajima, Y., Sakaigaichi, T., Matsuoka, M., & Sugimoto, A. (2012). Sugarcane breeding of early maturing clone with high sucrose content for earlier harvest in Japan. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 46(3), 227–235. DOI

Ullah, S., Ahmad Anjum, S., Mohsin Raza, M., Riaz, A., Abbas, A., Muhammad Yousif, M., Ma, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Cheng, D., Xu, Y., & Ali, I. (2016). Optimizing row spacing to ameliorate the productivity of spring sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Agricultural Sciences, 7(8), 531–538. DOI

Zhou, M., & Shoko, M. D. (2011). Seasonal and varietal effects on tiller population development of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 28(1), 11–16. DOI

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v44i1.2797

Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.